Could there ever be a MOOC for the sensitive subjects for undergraduate students
From my own
background of Criminology, I started to think if I would be happy to share my information/lessons
to students I had not met or discussed the topics with.
So, the topic
that I am thinking of falls under Victimology and the syllabus covers, human
trafficking, Harmful cultural practice (Female circumcision and Male
circumcision initiations) and child abuse. All these topics are very sensitive
and it is open for discussion as they need to be delved into to see the harm
that they cause.
Now before I
start this blog, I don’t think these topics can be discussed with undergrads
through an online platform due to the sensitive nature. Especially
when you are dealing with students who might have been through some of these
situations and that is why they have decided to go into these disciplines. But
I have decided to research and see if it would be possible.
There are many
resources that are available on how to deal with sensitive topics within the
classroom environment. For example, giving the assignment before the topic to
allow for students to understand what is coming (University
of Indiana Bloomington, 2017) , inform the students to “Criticize
ideas, not individuals” (Moore & Deshaies,
2012) .
However, this is easier to do when you are in the class with the students as
you can monitor their facial expressions and debrief the students if necessary.
You can also make sure that when students are pushing their opinions and framing
them in harmful ways you can ask them to rephrase. My focus is not necessarily
the students who are vocal as you can assist with that through the online
platform, but it is more the quiet students who may be struggling with this
practice. As a Criminology lecturer I felt that an important part of my job was
to assist students to look at topics from different points of view. For
example, the idea of female circumcision or genital mutilation (WHO, 2017) is abhorrent but to
be able to comment properly on this topic we need to look at the cultures that
may be continuing the process and why and get an understanding from their view.
So, can this be
done through an online platform and is it wise to share this information with
students that you have not come into contact with. The argument would be that
this information is already online, but my focus would be more the hard
questions that one needs to ask, such as should these practices be banned? Who
is responsible for the continuation of these practices? Who are the victims and
who are the offenders, looking at female circumcision, it is often the elder
ladies in the community who continue the practice, are the offenders?
These subjects
that I was lecturing was given as a distance program and then the students
attended lectures that I gave on the material, but I found that the students
who did not attend lectures did not have the ability to look in-depth at the
information and were never forced to ask the hard questions, which is such an
important part of developing skills in the humanities.
A very
interesting article that pertains to this subject is one by Reichard (2013) which looks at an
open letter by the San Jose State University Department of Philosophy in which
they refuse to be a part of an Edx course. The article sums up the opinion that
Humanities is a field that is open to so many opinions and that “The humanities
have to deal with ambiguity [and] with multiple answers,” (Reichard, 2013) . Which is where I
think I am coming from. The topics that are discussed in these fields are based
on the multiple answers and there is so often never a real answer to this.
There is also a loss of ‘personal touch’ (Reichard, 2013) of the education and
the topics that are discussed. When it is presented online it may be too easy
for the students to accept whatever is given to them instead of (if needed)
forced to face other opinions and points of view.
Another point
is presented by Koller and Ng (Reichard, 2013) who have found that
translating the courses to an online platform, especially the grading of
answers for the humanities is proving challenging. There is no way to make an
automatic memo that can answer the students as there are so many possible
answers to a statement. Because of this there would still need to be human
markers, which could make the burden of a MOOC too high. One way to overcome
this is that peer marking has been introduced, but this again raises concerns
as will the feedback be insightful enough to progress learning, Ng (Reichard,
2013)
found that this was the case. That even though there were now five feedbacks,
the feedback was not as insightful as a professor’s response.
I think subjects
such as these could be offered through online platform, but I think it is a good
idea to only offer it to a post graduate level. These students then have gone
through the ungraduated program and have more ability to cope with the difficult
subjects and now will have the ability to partake in the discussions with
minimal harm. They will also have developed their arguing skills and have
developed the ability to look at both sides of the argument.
After
completing my research, obviously this topic could be researched for years to
come, I think I am still in favour of certain subjects not being offered
online. Or at least if offered online not through a channel such as a MOOC. I
believe that the personal touch that these subjects warrant is crucial to
assisting students to learn in the future. I think it is also important that
the damage that some students might incur when doing these subjects without a
lecturer to lean on and to assist with debriefing could be more harmful than
helpful.
Bibliography
Moore, A. & Deshaies, M., 2012. Ten
Tips for Facilitating Classroom Discussions on. [Online]
Available at: http://bento.cdn.pbs.org/hostedbento-prod/filer_public/SBAN/Images/Classrooms/Ten%20Tips%20for%20Facilitating%20Classroom%20Discussions%20on%20Sensitive%20Topics_Final.pdf
[Accessed 16 October 2017].
Available at: http://bento.cdn.pbs.org/hostedbento-prod/filer_public/SBAN/Images/Classrooms/Ten%20Tips%20for%20Facilitating%20Classroom%20Discussions%20on%20Sensitive%20Topics_Final.pdf
[Accessed 16 October 2017].
Reichard, C.,
2013. MOOCs face challenges in teaching humanities. [Online]
Available at: http://www.stanforddaily.com/2013/06/04/moocs-face-challenges-in-teaching-humanities/
[Accessed 16 10 2017].
Available at: http://www.stanforddaily.com/2013/06/04/moocs-face-challenges-in-teaching-humanities/
[Accessed 16 10 2017].
University of
Indiana Bloomington, 2017. Managing Difficult Classroom Discussions. [Online]
Available at: https://citl.indiana.edu/teaching-resources/diversity-inclusion/managing-difficult-classroom-discussions/
[Accessed 16 October 2017].
Available at: https://citl.indiana.edu/teaching-resources/diversity-inclusion/managing-difficult-classroom-discussions/
[Accessed 16 October 2017].
WHO, 2017. Female
genital mutilation. [Online]
Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/
[Accessed 16 October 2017].
Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/
[Accessed 16 October 2017].
Very thoughtful and well argued post! I think a MOOC in this field can introduce the framework and provide an introduction to concepts but the dangers of discussing this openly are obvious. I know several cases where school discussions of sensitive issues like racial and sexual discrimination, bullying etc were almost impossible to deal with in class due to some class members disrupting all discussions. However when the discussion moved to a closed online discussion the quieter pupils were able to contribute more freely and the disruptive pupils were firmly told to stop by their peers. The resulting discussion was far more nuanced and mature than any classroom discussion had been. Online discussions can be held in safe closed groups but the content can be more open.
ReplyDelete